WEAPONS: The RFID zapper

Radio frequency IDs (RFIDs), small electronic chips that share information when scanned, are rapidly becoming an essential part of global supply management. In order to correctly route and track items from inception to purchase, these chips are attached to packaging and increasingly the products themselves.

The intentional disabling of these chips can cause supply chain disruption. The best method is to HERF (high energy radio frequency, usually microwaves) the chips using a small transmitter (read about high power home made microwave weapons for herfing). The German branch (privacy activists) of the global guerrilla innovation network has developed a simple solution that converts a standard film camera into a short range RFID zapper. This system:

"...copies the microwave-oven-method, but in a much smaller scale. It generates a strong electromagnetic field with a coil, which should be placed as near to the target-RFID-Tag as possible. The RFID-Tag then will recive a strong shock of energy comparable with an EMP and some part of it will blow, most likely the capacitator, thus deactivating the chip forever.

To keep the costs of the RFID-Zapper as low as possible, we decided to modify the electric component of a singe-use-camera with flashlight, as can be found almost everywhere. The coil is made from varnished wire and placed inside the camera exactly where the film has been.

Then the coil is soldered between the cameras electronic and its flashlight. Last but not least most single-use-cameras will require some kind of switch to be build into them, since their activating-mechanism usually is to small and primitive. Once the switch is connected and tested, the camera can be closed again and henceforth will serve as a RFID-Zapper, destroying RFID-Tags with the power of ordinary batteries."

Comments

[g510]

The distinction needs to be made between the use of an RFID zapper to protect one's own privacy, vs. the use of it to disrupt or harm someone else (e.g. a company's inventory system). In that respect these zappers are like firearms: legitimate for self-defense, not for attacking others.

I see no reason why a company couldn't manufacture an RFID zapper specifically for personal privacy protection, and constructed in such a manner as to discourage illegitimate uses. For that matter, retailers could install zappers at a location just beyond their checkout areas, to enable their customers to zap the RFID tags on merchandise they just purchased.

The use of RFID as a "peeping-Tom modality" necessarily leads to righteous resistance that is well-grounded in our own traditions. Above-board personal and commercial RFID "privacy protection devices" would fulfill a legitimate need and at the same time reduce demand for "underground" solutions that might otherwise mutate into aggressive weapons.

BTW, I mightily object to RFID peeping-Tomism, and I destroy such RFID tags as I find in my consumer purchases when I get them home. As for chips implanted in the human body, they can put a chip in me when they have my cold dead corpse.

[Martin-Éric]

Wonderful way to zap the biometric data on new passports being issued these days. Brilliant!

[Son Coahuila]

This blog referenceed this peice.

[Sarkast]

Would it work to put a US passport in a microwave and kill the RFID chip that way ?

[Kirk]

RFID chips are used for inventory tracking and more importantly they are now used to track animals. If a sample of meat is tested and is positive with mad cow and someone has disabled the tracking device then the proper action cannot be taken against the source of infection. SInce only a tiny fraction is ever tested (as the testing of all meat would be prohibitively expensive)the source of contamination will exist until another sample from that source is tested. That means many people will get infected with an incurable disease. You really need to think before you act.

[Tangurena]

Kirk, you are confusing several different things. Implanted RFID tags are part of NAIS, which isn't going to go into effect till 2007/8 in the US. Tracking of animals won't cure or prevent BSE/Scrapie/E.Coli because it isn't intended to. It is intended only to *appear* to be Doing Something™ to the countries we export agricultural products to.

There are a number of reasons that NAIS is broken, defective and can never fulfil its publically stated mission. Starting with Revelations 13:16-17 - He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.

Currently the tagging and registration is voluntary. Did you know that to "register" your farm that you have to give up your 4th Amendment right to search warrants? That every time an animal leaves, enters, is born or dies on your registered facility that you have to file electronically with NAIS? Or that NAIS is privatizing the database before it is even live?

ISO 11785 compliant implants start at $1.50 and go up. Only small farms have to use them. Large "farms" that keep critters in lots from birth to abattoir only have to serialize the lot, not the animals, so places that raise thousands of animals won't be paying $1.50/animal.

Sample Use Case:
- You raise cattle for the beef industry. Each calf when born requires tagging and notification for the USDA.

- You raise large amounts of cattle for the beef industry. Each calf requires registration, but no tagging as long as they stay in the same lots.

- You want to ride your horse to visit your family down the road. You must notify USDA when the horse leaves the registered "source" and when it arrives at the destination. You'll have to notify the USDA when it returns home. A filing fee must be paid for each leg of the journey.

- You take your horse out on the trail where it might comingle with other horses. You guessed it: notify and pay.

- Your kids raise sheep for 4H. They've already been tagged and registered. When you take them to the show/fair, you have to notify the USDA and pay the fees when you leave the farm and come back from the show.

- You raise sheep. They never leave your farm. You want to hire a stud to come visit to knock up your ewes. Now all your sheep must get RFID tagged.

- You raise quail and partridges for a local hunting club. You're out of business by 2009.

- You raise fish. Good luck tagging them with compliant rfid tags. You're out of business by 2009.

- You are Amish. Your religious beliefs prohibit you from obeying this law. Welcome to the tribulation.

- You've been farming since before time began. Now you must purchase a computer and internet service to comply with registration and reporting requirements. The USDA does not plan to begin notifying farmers that they are covered by the NAIS requirements until mid 2007, long after the comment period expires, and about 6 months before it becomes mandatory.

The claimed reason for creating NAIS is to cut down on E Coli, BSE and "animal bioterrorism." To eliminate E Coli infection of beef, all the industry would have to do is have the cattle graze on grass for the last 5 days before slaughter. Instead, many cattle stand knee deep in their own urine and feces in feed lots. The US forbids 100% testing of cattle for BSE (Europe and Japan require 100% testing), and permits it only for visibly symptomatic animals. Since it takes 4-5 years for the symptoms to become visible in infected cattle, and most beef cattle are slaughtered before they reach 4 years old, the failure to be able to mitigate BSE in US beef supplies is obvious. There haven't been any incidents of "animal bioterrorism" that I've ever heard of. Foot and Mouth disease was eradicated in the US over 70 years ago.

None of the regulations can meet the stated requirements. This means that the regulations exist for some different reason than the stated ones. The general consensus in the farming community is that these regulations are being made to make the general public less fearful when contaminated meat comes from a packing plant. We must protect the profit margins of big-farming no matter how much it screws the public or the smaller farmer.

[docsharp01]

Excellent article and comments.
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com

[marygloster]

One of your readers posted this comment:
"The only way to cause larger disruption would be either (a) a device that would disable at a medium range, a large enough distance to take out all RFIDs in, say, a shipyard or warehouse; (b) something to disable the receivers."
With the additional of how this could be accomplished.
A small thermo-nuclear detonation in a close proximity of the RFIDs would accomplish the desired disabling.

A short rant to the authors of this blog, Global Guerrillas.
Did you know that in order to comment on this site I was sent to another web site that required me to sign up and provide a legitimate email address before I could comment?
Your home page requests that I sign up in order to comment. What's the deal with that? Are you, 'global guerrillas', or home boy pussies that like to dress up and play revolutionarys?