David Brooks, one of the best editorialists on the illustrious New York Times roster, examines Brave New War (click to purchase) today with "The Insurgent Advantage" (which is, unfortunately, for subscribers only, although more than a few people have copied it onto their weblogs). Well worth the time to read.
It is interesting that the current form of US Army intelligence cannot keep up with the constant unending evolutionary changes in the Iraqi insurgency.
It was clearly evident in early 2005 that this insurgency is in fact a "capitalist insurgency" meaning that it can remain decentralized, committed in it's cause, always finding recruits via the internet and video CDs AND it's simplistic approach to force multiplication is the "mom and pop capitalism" that has sprung up to provide support to the various insurgent groups in Iraq.
As an insurgent you can fight as a 100 man group and have the impact of 500 and the scalablitiy is massive---in fact matches the concept of scalable networks pushed by Cisco Systems on the enterprise side for years.
I have not read the book Brave New War but as one who has spent hours speaking with Iraqi detainees and who now fully understands their concepts, culture and thoughts the book should be interesting.
What is interesting in my Iraqi experience is that what we learned and taught as UW in the mid to late 60s in Special Forces has actually not changed in all these years-only the technology has changed and that alone is a driver of a very real global jihad threat that many simply want to ignor.
Posted by: DiamondBack 01 | Friday, 18 May 2007 at 01:56 PM
"If anyone has a sharp speaking agent that would be interested in helping me...."
John,
Consider dropping Tom an email - I think he's had a lot of ups and downs in that regard and could at least offer a few suggestions.
Posted by: zenpundit | Saturday, 19 May 2007 at 12:11 AM
>>It was clearly evident in early 2005 that this insurgency is in fact a "capitalist insurgency" meaning that it can remain decentralized, committed in it's cause, always finding recruits via the internet and video CDs AND it's simplistic approach to force multiplication is the "mom and pop capitalism" that has sprung up to provide support to the various insurgent groups in Iraq.<<
If your're mentioning capitalism in the context of the Iraq war and the insurgency too here's another point, the 19 innocent Iraqis that were shot by a U.S. military who deemed 'trigger-happy,' was only valued at $2,000 dollars EACH! TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS for a live that's NON American.
Posted by: pm2075 | Saturday, 19 May 2007 at 01:21 AM
JUST $2000 per life. Unbelievable! That is why you get people who HATE the U.S. It really takes a lot for people to HATE a person. The U.S. should have SUPPRESSED this bit of info!! NO Reimbursement was given for those injured. NOTHING!! There's a huge abyss between the monetized value of an American life versus the monetized value of anybody outside the soveriegn borders of the U.S. $2000 you know what they'll be saying... Those infidels can spend that on their women and entertainment in just 1 hour!!
Posted by: pm2075 | Saturday, 19 May 2007 at 05:07 PM
Sir,
I have read your book and responded to it rather more favorably than David Brooks did. Specifically, I find that Ar Ramadi is currently attempting a local solution to the insurgency that is very open source in nature. Through support from Shayikh 'Abd-As-Sattar Ar-Rishawi, locals are handling public defense at the citizen level, and the guerrilla entrepeneur is finding himself increasingly less well tolerated among the populace of the city proper. I despair of this approach working exactly as well in Baghdad, but...that's where I have to just shut up and soldier.
So, as a personal witness to the effectiveness of "grass-roots terror fighters", I respectfully chide Mr. Brooks to reconsider his offhand dismissal. God forbid that the United States should fall this far; if it did, however, I'd be emailing you for your assistance in setting up defenses before David Brooks.
I have left the book in my office, and at least one officer has picked it up with the full intention of reading it. He's one of the young ones, but hey...it takes time to get top-heavy, pork-barrel institutions to change. It is my hope that we all change in time to work this mess out sooner, rather than later.
For those interested in open source reports on Shayikh Sattar, try this link.
www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-sheiks20apr20,0,3931359.story?coll=la-home-headlines - 19 May 2007
Posted by: Justin | Monday, 21 May 2007 at 02:57 AM