« Chevron vs. Nigerian Tribes |
| Grim Assessment »
August 23, 2005 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451576d69e200d8348936dd69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Christian Terrorism?:
» Extracting codeine from promethazine. from Buy codeine.
Tylenol 3 codeine. Codeine. [Read More]
Tracked on July 06, 2009 at 03:35 PM
Mr. Robertson didn't say 'assassination.' He said our special forces should 'take him out.' And 'take him out' can be a number of things, including kidnapping; there are a number of ways to take out a dictator from power besides killing him. He was misinterpreted by the AP, but that happens all the time.
Christian Broadcasting Network
Phone: (202) 833-2707
Fax: (202) 467-6951
1111 19th St NW
Washington, DC 20036
Melissa Charbonneau |
August 24, 2005 at 02:13 PM
You don't have to use the word to condone the action. Venzuela's problems are for Venzuela to solve, not the U.S.'s problem to solve. Regardless of Chavez's (deplorable) politics, he will continue selling oil to the U.S. no matter what. I am confused, however, how the good reverend can continue to claim he is a Christian when he calls for the elimination of individuals and covets the property of others.
August 24, 2005 at 02:40 PM
Amazing! They even bother to come and correct you with their new official line.
Miguel Octavio |
August 24, 2005 at 03:35 PM
Thanks for the clarification, but you can't kidnap a sitting head of state of a country the size of Venezuela. There is only one option, killing him. Also, "take him out" as it is commonly understood is assassination (inside the military or out).
As bad as the guy is, I doubt that even his vocal opposition (those that are currently suffering under his regime) would want the US to do this.
John Robb |
August 24, 2005 at 05:21 PM
Apparently, our CBN friends are mistaken even on this:
See here: 'a video of Monday's telecast shows that Robertson's exact words were: "You know, I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war, and I don't think any oil shipments will stop."'
August 24, 2005 at 06:15 PM
"In a statement on his website, Mr Robertson, who has a history of making inflammatory remarks, repeated criticisms of Mr Chavez, the twice-elected leftist president of Venezuela.
'Is it right to call for assassination? No, and I apologise for that statement,' he said."
Now, let's see how Melissa is going to spin this one...
August 25, 2005 at 08:02 AM
I'm not so sure assassinating Chavez *wouldn't* be the start of a war.
Gotta understand, after the fall of Lula, this guy is our last hope. :-)
I'm very curious about this statement. I understand Robertson is a private citizen and all that, but the US is a swarm intelligence too, right? So only one "entrepreneur" in the bazaar needs to raise an idea and see who flocks to it and the swarm as a whole can learn something about whether there's an appetite in the US for this kind of thing.
The US public is, after all, easily persuaded that they have a *right* to Venezuelan oil, and that to threaten that supply makes one a legitimate target. Let's see what other charges they can trump up against him over the next few months.
phil jones |
August 25, 2005 at 10:53 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.