Zen does. Excellent post. Where's the systemic resilience to abate the threat?
« Tainter on complex societies | Main | The youth bulge »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451576d69e200d834c09ac653ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Worry about global guerrilla super-empowerment?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Much thanks for the link !
The systemic resilience is difficult to build because there is no natural " hook" for politicians, unlike, say, engineers. Even CEO types will see the bottom line expenditure rather than the larger costs saved by having redundancies to weather an attack.
Posted by: zenpundit | October 29, 2006 at 10:51 PM
The systemic resilience is in empowering counter-factions of global guerrillas and super-empowered individuals to interfere with and essentially negate the bad actors. You see this battling networks of computer hackers and the 1990s Open Society Institute activity in E. Europe countering the neo-communist networks to cite two examples.
It's Federalist #10's faction logic on steroids because it extends the factional battlefield beyond the lines of any single polity.
Posted by: TM Lutas | October 30, 2006 at 10:22 PM
TM Lutas: Now you're sounding like a 5GWarrior!
Posted by: Curtis Gale Weeks | November 01, 2006 at 01:54 AM
Curtis Gale Weeks - If I am, I was one for years before I ever heard of 5GW. For me, the insight is obvious. It is an update of Letters of Marque and Reprisal, outsourcing the monopoly of violence of the state to where and when the state cannot reach in the case of my first example. In the 2nd case, it is mere extrapolation from previous trends, an uncomfortable extrapolation for the NGOs to which it applies.
Posted by: TM Lutas | November 03, 2006 at 03:52 PM