Iraq. December 2005. As the US military's attention was focused on the chaotic political process in Iraq, the open source insurgency has switched targets yet again. While the ongoing methods continue (IEDs, Suicide bombers, etc.) at a reduced rate, the clear focus of Iraq's open source guerrillas has shifted towards systems disruption -- the aim of which is to delegitimizing the political process from the ground up (see
State Failure 101 for more on how this process works). Historically, this has been effective against the two previous governments. To accomplish this, the guerrillas have (rightly, from a purely theoretical standpoint) focused attacks on electricity using the following methods:
- Attacked power lines. The US military conceded that 2,800 megawatts of the country's potential 7,100 megawatts (7,200 megawatts is the average demand) is disrupted, mostly due to sabotage, at any given time (nearly 40%). This is a slight improvement over 2004 numbers. Network analysis, tempo, and efficiency play a role here.
- Attack contractors and workers. 32 assaults were recorded (likely conservative) in December against contractors including: 6 killed, 5 wounded, and 2 kidnapped (this is a renewed continuation of the operational method I called Halliburton Targeting that I wrote about in 2004).
- Increased inefficiency. Ongoing attacks have added both excessive costs to the reconstruction effort and ongoing delays (see Disrupting Reconstruction for a more detailed description of how this works).
The result is that Baghdad gets only 6 hours of erratic electricity a day now, down from 11 hours in October. The rest of the country averages 13 hours a day. The rapid shifts in focus are indicative of global guerrilla open source methods. It doesn't reflect central planning but rather an ability to swarm quickly on vulnerabilities to maximize impact at minimal cost. Note also that this level of disruption has only been matched by the US air campaigns over the last decade (read the brief on
EBOs for more on this method).